When considering supplier performance, the first thing that comes to mind is probably whether they deliver on time. In many organizations, this is the primary yardstick used to judge suppliers. If the truck arrives on the scheduled day, the supplier is considered reliable. But anyone who has worked in supply chain or manufacturing for long enough knows that “on time” is just the tip of the iceberg.

Beneath the surface, measuring the real supplier performance is far more complex. A supplier who consistently meets on-time delivery standards can still cause serious problems for your business. These hidden issues are often overlooked as “just part of the process” until they start impacting the business through real costs, wasting labor hours, and disrupting production schedules.

In this article, we will examine why “good enough” supplier performance can be a dangerous comfort zone for any company. We’ll discuss how reliance on surface-level KPIs and informal workarounds can mask larger issues, and we’ll demonstrate why true supplier reliability necessitates deeper visibility, improved data, and a more proactive approach.

The problem with “on-time equals good”

On-time delivery is important, but it’s not the whole story. For example:

A shipment arrives on the promised date, but half the materials fail quality checks. Production still gets impacted.
The delivery arrives at 6 p.m. instead of the morning, forcing overtime to meet production schedules and hurrying other downstream processes, which can potentially impact quality and customer service.
The order arrives, but key documentation is missing, resulting in delays in customs clearance.

In all of these cases, the supplier can still claim they delivered “on time,” but the impact on your operations tells a different story.

According to McKinsey, supply chain disruptions can wipe out 45% of one year’s profits over a decade. Many of these disruptions come not from missed deliveries, but from late discoveries of problems that were technically “on time” but functionally useless.

5 Hidden costs of “good enough” supplier performance

When supplier issues go undetected or unaddressed, the costs accumulate in ways that don’t always appear on standard dashboards and reports.

1. Extra labor and overtime

Late-day or incomplete deliveries often mean teams have to stretch late or re-plan the production schedules. This not only increases labor costs but also puts unnecessary strain on employees.

2. Production rescheduling

If a raw material fails inspection or the shipment is incomplete, production lines might have to be stopped and restarted. The cost here isn’t just idle machines but the lost production capacity that can’t be recovered.

3. Expedited shipping

When a “good enough” supplier underdelivers, companies often resort to rush orders to keep production running. Rush shipping can cost three to four times more than standard freight rates. An avoidable cost that is often confused with logistics costs and overlooked.

4. Inventory distortions

If suppliers provide inaccurate shipment data, inventory systems might reflect materials that haven’t actually arrived or passed quality checks. This leads to poor planning decisions and potential stockouts.

5. Compliance and risk exposure

Incorrect or missing documentation can delay customs clearance, cause regulatory non-compliance, or expose companies to penalties.

These costs are often invisible because they’re absorbed into operational budgets. Over time, though, they can become a major drain. Companies underestimate the full cost of poor supplier performance because they only measure direct purchase prices and basic delivery KPIs.

Why Surface-Level KPIs Fall Short?

Most supplier scorecards in the traditional companies focus on age-old metrics like:

On-time delivery percentage
Quantity accuracy
Price adherence

While useful, these metrics are reactive, backward-looking, and limited. They tell you what happened, not why it happened or how it impacted your business.

For example, even if a supplier delivers 95% of shipments on time, continuing to ship at the end of the day still disrupts your teams. However, when the scorecard fails to account for delivery windows or quality pass rates, it paints an incomplete picture.

The Role of Data and Visibility

True supplier performance management requires looking beyond the traditional surface KPIs to understand the real operational impact. That means capturing and analyzing data such as:

Lead time variability
First-pass quality rates
Delivery window adherence
Document and compliance accuracy
Communication responsiveness

Collecting this data in real time is essential and vital. Relying on quarterly reviews or manual updates means you’re always reacting to problems after the fact. It's essentially a post-mortem with no meaningful actionability.

5 Steps of moving from “good enough” to truly reliable

The companies that manage supplier performance most effectively share a few common practices. These practices are proactive in nature, such as:

Integrate supplier data into inventory and production planning
This ensures your planning systems reflect the real-time status of incoming materials, not just the expected dates or ship date + average lead times.
Set performance targets that reflect operational needs
Include metrics beyond generic on-time delivery, such as delivery window, quality pass rate, and documentation accuracy.
Conduct root cause analysis on recurring issues
Don’t just react and firefight problems; instead, identify the root cause and address it with the supplier.
Build long-term collaborative relationships
Share visibility via real-time data with suppliers so they understand what is coming their way and the impact of their performance on your operations.
Use real-time alerts and monitoring tools
This enables your team to respond to potential issues before they escalate into production stoppages.

Why Does This Matter Now?

Global supply chains are under more strain than ever. Demand patterns shift quickly, transportation networks face sudden and unexpected disruptions, and as a result, raw material availability can change overnight. In this environment, “good enough” supplier performance isn’t safe; rather, it’s an ever-lurking risk.

When you settle for surface-level performance, you expose your business to hidden costs and operational surprises. When you push for deeper visibility and proactive management, you gain control, reduce costs, and protect your production schedules.

Take Your Supplier Performance From “Good Enough” to “Truly Reliable” with Holocene

Holocene's real-time data tools were created to bridge the gap between what your supplier reports and even what really happens. By capturing shipment updates, quality inspection results, and compliance documentation from multiple sources, Holocene provides a real-time snapshot of supplier performance.

This means you can detect problems early, immediately update production and inventory plans, and also have data-led, fact-based discussions with suppliers. This one move enables your business to transition from firefighting to prevention, and the savings add up over time.

If your teams are tired of late delivery surprises, struggling with incomplete orders, or keep trying workarounds to somehow meet the production targets, it is time to evaluate your supplier more closely.

Visit the Holocene website to discover how real-time visibility can reveal hidden costs, boost reliability, and improve your overall supply chain performance.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. Why is supplier performance of critical importance to production efficiency?

Because even “on-time” deliveries can hide issues. A strong supplier performance risk system ensures the value produced matches the investment in procurement and keeps operations consistent.

2. How can procurement strategies cut hidden costs from “good enough” suppliers?

By going beyond quotations and price, considering factors like delivery window, quality rates, and compliance. This fair, consistent framework improves efficiency and reduces costly disruptions.

3. What difference does collaboration make to supplier performance?

Collaboration fosters clear targets, innovation, and consistent meeting of schedules. Joint effort and data sharing help address issues before they scale.

4. How can companies determine ROI from supplier performance improvements?

Track fewer delays, lower expedited shipping, and better quality after investment. The savings typically outweigh the cost of tools and training in most industries.

5. What framework helps manage supplier performance risk at scale?

Clear contracts, balanced procurement, real-time reviews, and training. This supports efficiency, innovation, and fair supplier relationships.

‍